Sorry
I'm busy, so I won't have much time for blogging.
Libertarianism from a practical, consequentialist perspective.
Veronique de Rugy explains the success of Iceland as a model for tax competition. Iceland cut its taxes and has grown an average of 5% per year, which means its now among countries like Switzerland as a haven for wealth.
Going where the private sector has never gone before.
Drizzten at Magnifisyncopathological explains why it's a bad idea to vote for either Bush or Kerry in November, though I'm more sympathetic to pragmatism than he is.
This article from the Foundation for Economic Education goes into detail about the negative aspects of the Canadian health system. It also notes a mistake that people make regarding "free" government services, they might be free from the consumer's perspective, but it's not free if you're a taxpayer. So government services can be used as a wealth redistributing tool, as well as a source of vote-buying.
According to the Reason Public Policy Institute affordable housing laws don't work (warning PDF file) and they site my hometown of Orange County, California as evidence of the law's failure.
I've just installed some text ad thing (look on the right). I don't quite know how it works, but I'm giving it a shot.
Anthony de Jasay discusses the economy of Europe and the contradictory relationship between economic growth and social "justice".
This TCS article discusses the rise of euroscepticism, especially as it relates to the recently held parliamentary elections. One interesting thing about this phenomenon is that euroscepticism seems to transcend the whole left-right dichotomy. Fear of increasing EU integration ranges from free-marketeers, greens, hard leftists, as well as moderates. My main reason for noting this is that it seems, at least to me, that the whole left-right dichotomy seems to be waning, especially regarding the relationship between the EU and its member states. For example, conservatives in the UK tend to eurosceptic, while many conservatives in the Scandanavian countries tend to be pro-EU.
There's a big myth that in the U.S. we have a free-market system, well that's not true. The article I linked to doesn't mention this, but I'm of the belief that a lot of the reason medical costs are rising is a combination of regulation, litigation, and the subsidizing of medical consumption.
Don at Cafe Hayek makes an interesting point. Even if voters vote for a party that advocates limited government, they may not necessarily get their wish. He points to findings in public choice economics, especially Arrow's impossibility theorem, to show that there can be a huge disconnect between what politicians want and what voters want.
Wow, Economics is a fascinating subject. Did you know there's a sub-discipline known as the Economics of Religion? There's a website devoted to it here.
Arnold Kling argues, "that Reagan's main contributions were on energy policy, tax reform, and resisting government expansion." He believes that the tax simplification of 1986 was more important than the tax cuts of 1981. He also credits him on the lifting of price controls on energy.
According to the Cato Institute, winner-takes-all systems reinforce limited government while PR systems tend to lead to increases in the welfare state. If you've been reading my blog regularly you're well aware of my reservations of our current electoral system. I must say, though, I'm not entirely convinced with the Cato study. Most of the comparisons that are done are between the US and Europe. Is it possible that there are factors other than electoral systems account for larger welfare states and to what degree does an electoral system have on the size of the state. The US and UK use winner-takes-all systems, but they also have a history of economic liberalism, couldn't that account for the size of the state? Plus I think there's a counter example to the study, namely Switzerland, where they have use proportional representation and have a high degree of economic freedom.
An excellent article on TCS about rent control. What's harmful about rent control?
What do I want from a political party (or candidate)? I've decided to list some minimum requirements, most of which center around the economy and the size/role of government.
I've been wanting to do a post like this for some time now. Every now and then I think about the two party system we have in the US and why I detest it. First of all the differences between the two parties are, at best, overstated. Second, our electoral system is rigged (unintentionally, I believe) so that no one can compete with them. Third, we have terrible ballot access laws that are (intentionally) rigged to make it easier for the two major parties to run candidates. I'll post some more on political parties tomorrow, this quasi-rant isn't over yet.
According to a recent study, since handguns were banned in Britain, crime has increased considerably. Some interesting facts:
The California Libertarian Party supports reforming the "Three Strikes" law. This law often hurts people who have commit non-violent crimes more than violent ones.
The Center for Voting and Democracy, an organization that advocates the use of IRV and Full/Proportional Representation has a news story on its website that Iraq and Afghanistan will get PR. I wish we had PR here so our current two-party duopoly can be broken, but that's not likely to happen anytime soon.
Are you as sick of the old template that I used as I am? I think this new one is much better. I hope you like it too.
I've added two links to my Activism area of my blog. One is Open Debates, which advocates letting non-major party candidates join presidential debates, and Verified Voting, which advocates the use of voting systems that have a verifiable paper trail.
What leads to unemployment? Thomas Sowell thinks high minimum wages and powerful unions play a role.
Neal Boortz explains to us why zero tolerance laws are a bad idea. Some examples:
Did you know that today is the 200th birthday of Richard Cobden? He was one of the leading figures in the fight for free trade in England, which led the way for prosperity and globalization. For an analysis of Richard Cobden and the upcoming Euro elections click here.
How exactly can we make the federal government smaller? Well, the Cato Institute has a plan. This document (warning PDF file) is filled with all sorts of interesting stuff. Go ahead and take look. You would be suprised how many programs can be terminated, privatized, or devolved to the state and local levels.
I recommend all bloggers out there to add The Angry Economist to your blogrolls. My only complaint is that he doesn't post often enough, but other than that it's an excellent blog. Today he has interesting post that discusses the value of dividends.
Just for fun, I've made a poll (see right) to see what type of libertarians visit my website. Go ahead and vote.
"If the European Union were a state in the USA it would belong to the poorest group of states. France, Italy, Great Britain and Germany have lower GDP per capita than all but four of the states in the United States. In fact, GDP per capita is lower in the vast majority of the EU-countries (EU 15) than in most of the individual American states. This puts Europeans at a level of prosperity on par with states such as Arkansas, Mississippi and West Virginia. Only the miniscule country of Luxembourg has higher per capita GDP than the average state in the USA."